From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Aug 23 11:12:13 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F158444176 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:08:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:08:19 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MI4YZ18720 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:04:35 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17hwIR-00006R-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:03:03 -0700 Received: from neo.pittstate.edu ([198.248.208.13]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17hwHb-0005o2-00 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:02:12 -0700 Received: from [198.248.208.11] (macdaddy.pittstate.edu [198.248.208.11]) by neo.pittstate.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7MI1QW7000365; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:01:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: To: "Craig R.Hughes" , jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) From: Justin Shore Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Highest-scoring false positive Cc: SpamAssassin List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:01:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:01:51 -0500 Like an alias for each list that points to the nonspamtrap address. J At 10:50 AM -0700 8/22/02, Craig R.Hughes wrote: >Are you filtering the nonspamtrap for spam when those newsletters >sold your address to someone you didn't sign up with? You should >probably manually verify that all the mail in the trap is in fact >nonspam! > >C > >On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 07:59 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > >> >>Justin Shore said: >> >>>I just ran across a false positive that scored 8.6. The message was >>>a solicited ad from Apple.com on educator deals. I can send a copy >>>if anyone wants it. >> >>Yes, please do send it on, and I'll add it to the non-spam corpus. >> >>To date, the scores evolved by SpamAssassin are very biased towards >>non-HTML, non-newsletter-ish mail. This release should be different, as >>I've been spending the last month signing up a "nonspamtrap" to every >>legit newsletter I can find ;) >> >>This should mean that tests which match common-enough newsletter practices >>will no longer get such high scores once we re-run the GA. -- -- Justin Shore, ES-SS ES-SSR Pittsburg State University Network & Systems Manager http://www.pittstate.edu/ois/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk