From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Thu Oct 3 16:02:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA94516F17 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:02:53 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 16:02:53 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g93DOZK30584 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:24:40 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g93DM6f02996; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:06 +0200 Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu (mail.phy.duke.edu [152.3.182.2]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g93DKbf24978 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:20:37 +0200 Received: from opus.phy.duke.edu (opus.phy.duke.edu [152.3.182.42]) by mail.phy.duke.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D477030199 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Python 2.2 site libs? From: seth vidal To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net In-Reply-To: <1810000.1033647373@spawn.se7en.org> References: <1810000.1033647373@spawn.se7en.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Message-Id: <1033651236.19916.1.camel@opus> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:20:33 -0400 Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:20:33 -0400 --=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:16, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Anyone know where one could get rpms for alot of the python libraries for= =20 > 2.2? >=20 > Its darn annoying the way RH ship python 1.5.2 and python 2.2 (as python2= )=20 > and libs that only work with one or the other :( >=20 > esp. the pgdb and xml modules. >=20 > Anyone know why Red Hat insist on sticking with python 1.5.2? > they are on python 2.2 for 8.0 - but they don't like to break compatibility during major releases. therefore: 6.X was 1.5.2 b/c that was current 7.x was 1.5.2 b/c that was current when 7.0 was released. -sv --=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9nEQh1Aj3x2mIbMcRAg/FAJ9MNwAv4hzpR4gjkMGGtGUjFKidQQCgk0ZE DlQVAibjHkM4H9ZBYzs0xb4= =8gIA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh-- _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list