From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Wed Oct 2 15:59:28 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C267B16F1B for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:59:09 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:59:09 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92EoSK13489 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:50:32 +0100 Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D52F3F9FC; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:51:03 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E383F997 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:50:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g92EowP32688 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:50:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92Eovf32684 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:50:57 -0400 Received: from dimebox.bmc.com (adsl-66-140-152-233.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [66.140.152.233]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92EW7i07408 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:32:07 -0400 Received: by dimebox.bmc.com (Postfix, from userid 1205) id 7E38F37EAB; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:50:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dimebox.bmc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dimebox.bmc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF5737EAA for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:50:56 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 cvs 10/01/2002 with nmh-1.0.4 In-Reply-To: <1033566989.394.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> References: <30957.1033532534@dimebox.bmc.com> <1033566989.394.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> Comments: In-reply-to Chris Garrigues message dated "Wed, 02 Oct 2002 08:56:27 -0500." To: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org Subject: Re: Bindings problem with current CVS code MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Hal DeVore X-Image-Url: http://www.geocities.com/hal_devore_ii/haleye48.gif Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <6714.1033570251@dimebox.bmc.com> X-Loop: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org Sender: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:50:51 -0500 >>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, "Chris" == Chris Garrigues wrote: Chris> Flist_FindUnseen has changed to Flist_FindSeqs. I guess I was sleepier than I thought. I managed to cut and paste the _right_ stuff from the app-defaults file into the Bindings definition dialog without ever noticing that it was different from what was in my exmhbindings file. --Hal P.S., can I get a pointer to a freeware Tcl/Tk debugger? _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers