From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Tue Sep 24 19:48:31 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D61016F03 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:48:30 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:48:30 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8OHftC14906 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:41:55 +0100 Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCC9404E3; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AD74058F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8OHTdg25948 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:29:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8OHTdf25944 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:29:39 -0400 Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com (IDENT:o9SX/V2vSkSNogAwP663lVz/JOIlGdTy@jump-austin.vircio.com [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8OHBni01193 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:11:49 -0400 Received: (qmail 17610 invoked by uid 104); 24 Sep 2002 17:29:38 -0000 Received: from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4224. . Clean. Processed in 0.36098 secs); 24/09/2002 12:29:38 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Sep 2002 17:29:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14155 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 17:29:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com) ([127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Sep 2002 17:29:37 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Scott Lipcon Cc: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org Subject: Re: traceback in new exmh In-Reply-To: <20020924023505.8CAE937B@mercea.net> References: <20020924023505.8CAE937B@mercea.net> X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1249285507P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1032888576.14149.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> From: Chris Garrigues X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57 Reply-To: Chris Garrigues X-Loop: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org Sender: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:29:35 -0500 --==_Exmh_-1249285507P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > From: Scott Lipcon > Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:35:05 -0400 > > The speed is a problem for sure - It takes a long time to do the > rescanning of sequences (I associate it with hitting the 'flist' > button, or when my background flist goes off). I'm running on a > pretty fast system (Athlon 1700+, 512Mb RAM, 10k RPM ultra SCSI disk) > and hitting flist used to take no more than a second. The big > difference might just be perception, because the the old code just > updated all the folders (count + color) all at once, instead of making > it look like there is 0 unseen, then counting its way back up. > > I doubt I'll have much time in the immediate future to hack at this, > but if I do - can you suggest areas that might be the best to > optimize? If not, do you think we can put in some preferences to > disable some of the more intensive features? I'd rather disable all > the sequence support (except unseen, of course) and have reasonable > speed. I suspect people on slow machines would find the current > state unusable. If I knew where the problem was, I'd fix it myself. Finding it is probably more work than the actual fix. > > > > This is because of your Hook_MsgShow_update_unseen which is calling a fun > ctio > > n > > which no longer exists. > > > > I suspect you need > > Seq_Del $exmh(folder) unseen $msgid > > now instead of > > Mh_MarkSeen $exmh(folder) $msgid > > > > Thanks. I'm not sure I'll need it with the new sequence code, but I > might. Does your new code commit sequences immediately? The old code > didn't, so I put that in to help keep my mh and exmh windows in sync. Yes it does. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers. --==_Exmh_-1249285507P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE9kKD/K9b4h5R0IUIRAp9DAJsF2W+5cvbayu3szYhYW7TUdAb64QCfT3/t vgMbAAyyOjJW465cwD6wpfk= =0Rwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1249285507P-- _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers