From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 7 21:53:06 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E2716F1E for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:52:29 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:29 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g872ONC03451 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 03:24:23 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EAD2940E5; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Received: from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net [64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DDBAB2940D8 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22857 invoked by uid 501); 7 Sep 2002 02:21:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 02:21:09 -0000 From: CDale To: Geege Schuman Cc: bitbitch@magnesium.net, "Adam L. Beberg" , Subject: RE: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 21:21:09 -0500 (CDT) Why should I? (: C On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote: > quitcherbraggin. > > :-) > gg > > -----Original Message----- > From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of CDale > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM > To: bitbitch@magnesium.net > Cc: Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org > Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) > > > I dunno, BB. Women who like to be thought of this way should have the > right to choose to be treated this way. Men too... ahem. (: My boy > cleans, washes clothes, cooks, fixes stuff, etc, and works the same number > of hours I do, sometimes more, if he has to catch up with me. (: I > close him because he is industrious and creative, and because he > unfailingly makes my bed the minute I get out of it. And boy #2 will be > here soon to help boy #1 with other things such as pedicures, backrubs, > and sure, fucking. LOL! (along with the aforementioned "chores") Adam can > have his cake and eat it too, if he can only find the right girl who has > the same beliefs about gender roles that he has. Of course, he has NO > clue where to look, so we will be constantly laughing at him while he > stumbles around in the dark. > Cindy > P.S. the numbers do not in any way indicate importance or favor -- only > the order in which they move into my house. -smiles at chris- > P.S. #2. I'm moving. Going to New Orleans. Can't handle any more cab > driving. The summer sucked here on the MS Gulf Coast, instead of rocking > like it normally does. Wish me luck. I'm going to look for another > computer job. Le Sigh. (: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote: > > > Hello Adam, > > > > Thursday, September 05, 2002, 11:33:18 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > ALB> So, you're saying that product bundling works? Good point. > > > > Sometimes I wish I was still in CA. You deserve a good beating every > > so often... (anyone else want to do the honors?) > > > > ALB> And how is this any different from "normal" marriage exactly? Other > then > > ALB> that the woman not only gets a man, but one in a country where both > she and > > ALB> her offspring will have actual opportunities? Oh and the lack of > > ALB> "de-feminized, over-sized, self-centered, mercenary-minded" choices? > > > > Mmkay. For the nth time Adam, we don't live in the land of > > Adam-fantasy. Women actually are allowed to do things productive, > > independent and entirely free of their male counterparts. They aren't > > forced to cook and clean and merely be sexual vessels. Sometimes, > > and this will come as a shock to you, no doubt, men and women even > > find -love- (which is the crucial distinction between this system) and > > they marry one another for the satisfaction of being together. I > > know, far-fetched and idealistically crazy as it is, but such things > > do happen. I can guarantee you, if my mother was approached by my > > father, and 25 years ago, he commented on her cleaning ability as a > > motivator for marrying her, we would not be having this conversation > > now. > > > > If guys still have silly antequated ideas about 'women's role' then > > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce. Again, these > > situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the relationship > > is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a prostitute he > > doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't impoverished > > and teeming with AIDS. A contract, versus a true love-interest > > marriage. > > > > Egh. I really need to stop analyzing your posts to this extent. I > > blame law school and my cat. > > > > -BB > > > > ALB> - Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg > > ALB> http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/ > > ALB> beberg@mithral.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn > > > > > -- "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn