From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Aug 27 04:17:15 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC09943F9B for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:17:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 04:17:15 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7R3FvZ23841 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 04:16:00 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3AE2940AE; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Received: from mithral.com (watcher.mithral.com [204.153.244.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4ED229409E for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6353 invoked by uid 1111); 27 Aug 2002 03:13:53 -0000 From: "Adam L. Beberg" To: Geege Cc: Subject: Re: Rambus, Man In-Reply-To: <200208262039.NAA20810@stories2.idg.net> Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:13:53 -0700 (PDT) On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Geege wrote: > Summary: > Latest Rambus memory plus fast bus appear to give Intel's newest P4 the > jolt it needs. > > Geege attached the following message: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ha ha ha harley. rambus earns it. > ------------------------------------------------------------ "Expect a 3 percent to 5 percent boost with PC1066" 5% faster for only 4 times [pricewatch at 7:55PM - 93 vs 379] the cost. Gimme gimme gimme! And I better get the full 5% speedup. And gime me that 20% faster GeForce 4600 at twice the cost of the 4200 too. Seriously, who falls for this scam? P.S. finished the PS2 port, it benchmarks at fp:1 int:40. a celeron 525 benches at fp:460 int:400... If it's not a polygon fill the thing is useless. There will be no beowolf cluster of these. It is 3x faster then the iPaq tho at 1/13 :) - Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/ beberg@mithral.com