From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Aug 28 10:50:16 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3678844155 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:50:00 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7RKrhZ25471 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:53:44 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4392940D4; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Received: from hotmail.com (dav46.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.22.18]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FAA29409A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:52:43 -0700 X-Originating-Ip: [63.224.51.161] From: "Mr. FoRK" To: "FoRK (E-mail)" References: Subject: Re: Startups, Bubbles, and Unemployment (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: X-Originalarrivaltime: 27 Aug 2002 20:52:43.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0C87850:01C24E0B] Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:50:31 -0700 > Ultimately, there was a big > disagreement about how to sell the product (sales guys wanted to sell > the thing for a gazillion dollars to megaclients, but we thought it > would make more sense to get more people using it so we could get more > feedback from many different places). The bottom line was that the > route we wound up going (megaclients for megabucks) had a megalong > sales cycle. The sales force staffed up and tried to sell the > earliest releases of the software -- even succeeding in a few > significant cases -- but couldn't get enough to cover their own > expenses, much less the actual development of the product. Now where have I seen that before.... oh yeah... its happening to me right now...