From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Aug 23 11:08:40 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6378747C6B for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:06:51 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MLNVZ25364 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:23:31 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7A62940B5; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Received: from sunserver.permafrost.net (u172n16.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.172.16]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690A6294099 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.123.179] (helo=permafrost.net) by sunserver.permafrost.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hzMf-0000L2-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:19:37 -0300 Message-Id: <3D6556DC.5070408@permafrost.net> From: Owen Byrne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Stoddard Cc: "Fork@Xent.Com" Subject: Re: The case for spam References: Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------080808010909060409040405" Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:25:48 -0300 --------------080808010909060409040405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill Stoddard wrote: >>No one likes commercial spam. >> >> >And no one like unsolicited political spam. End of story. > >Bill >http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork > > Except perhaps for the people in charge. Owen http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-954903.html *Political spam on your cell phone?* By Lisa M. Bowman Special to ZDNet News August 22, 2002, 12:05 PM PT URL: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-954909.html <%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-954909.html%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20> *In a decision that treats text messaging on mobile phones essentially the same as bumper stickers, the Federal Election Commission has declared that senders of text-based political ads don't have to disclose who funded them.* In an advisory opinion issued Thursday, the FEC also suggested such messages include either a phone number or Web site link, so people could easily learn who paid for the message. However, the additional information won't be required. The opinion could encourage the adoption of text-based political ads, as campaign experts look for new technological ways to sway voters. At the same time, opponents of the plan fear it could lead to anonymous political spam. Target Wireless, a small New Jersey-based wireless media company, had asked the FEC for an opinion on the matter, saying that requiring financial disclosures on short messaging service (SMS) mailings would use up too much of the 160 character-maximum. Political messages on bumper stickers and buttons are also exempt from the financial disclosure requirement. Target Wireless' petition was supported by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association, and some advertising trade groups. FEC spokesman Bob Biersack said the opinion was in keeping with the commission's policy not to meddle with new technology that has the potential to reach more voters. "We have tried very hard not to get in the way--particularly before everyone understands how the technology is going to work," he said. Opponents of the plan have worried the exemption might encourage spam or allow senders to blast people with mass amounts of negative political messages while remaining anonymous. Biersack said the FEC can revisit the issue if those problems surface. Target Wireless President Craig Krueger characterized the opinion as "good for America." "It will allow people to receive more communication from those running for office," he said. "We have free speech on our side." --------------080808010909060409040405-- http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork