From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 26 16:57:11 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B491743F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7QFopZ31540 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:50:51 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM71-0006j9-00; Mon,
    26 Aug 2002 08:49:07 -0700
Received: from adsl-209-204-188-196.sonic.net ([209.204.188.196]
    helo=sidebone.sidney.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17jM6Y-0003PI-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:38 -0700
Received: from siddhi (siddhi.sidney.com [192.168.93.20]) by
    sidebone.sidney.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g7QFmVCp013874 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700
Message-Id: <009901c24d18$0777a2b0$145da8c0@sidney.com>
From: "Sidney Markowitz" <sidney@sidney.com>
To: <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208251909050.24834-100000@aztec.zanshin.com>
    <yf2it1ykuf1.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.40 RELEASE: oops -- newer freqs.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.19 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:31 -0700

Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com> wrote:
> Exactly, except that I think you may be too optimistic
> about the reporting, the timeframe, and the accuracy.

That's another argument for a "HLL" (Habeas Licensee List) which would be less
inclusive than a test for the mark of for HIL, but more timely and accurate. When an
ip address is on the HLL it could get a huge negative score, bigger than the Habeas
mark alone.

 -- sidney




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

